Local Data Search

 

King Philip Middle School

 
18 King St
Norfolk MA, 02056, Norfolk County
Phone: 508-541-7324

Ranking: (360 out of 1,316, top 27%)*
Type: Regular Middle School
Status: Currently Operational
Grade: Grade 7 to Grade 8
School District: King Philip School District
Title I Eligible School: Yes School-Wide Title I: NA
Magnet: NA
Charter: NA
Shared-Time School: NA

Students and Teachers

      2013-2014         2012-2013         2011-2012         2010-2011         2009-2010         2008-2009         2007-2008    
 Amount%Amount%Amount%Amount%Amount%Amount%Amount%
Total Teachers:47 46 50 46 42 47 47 
Total Students:801 836 877 847 776 808 839 
Grade 7:38047.4%41850.0%41547.3%46554.9%38349.4%40149.6%41149.0%
Grade 8:42152.6%41850.0%46252.7%38245.1%39350.6%40750.4%42851.0%
Ungraded:00.0%00.0%00.0%00.0%00.0%00.0%NANA
Student By Gender:
Male:42853.4%43251.7%45952.3%45453.6%41353.2%42252.2%42951.1%
Female:37346.6%40448.3%41847.7%39346.4%36346.8%38647.8%40047.7%
Student By Races:
American Indian/Alaska Native:10.1%20.2%30.3%50.6%30.4%00.0%00.0%
Asian:101.2%131.6%111.3%91.1%30.4%60.7%101.2%
Hispanic:121.5%91.1%101.1%91.1%50.6%60.7%101.2%
Black:131.6%81.0%60.7%60.7%70.9%30.4%101.2%
White:75694.4%79194.6%83595.2%80795.3%74896.4%78997.6%80395.7%
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander:10.1%00.0%00.0%00.0%00.0%10.1%NANA
Two or More Races:81.0%131.6%121.4%111.3%101.3%30.4%NANA
Lunch Program:
Free Lunch Program Eligible:546.7%556.6%515.8%414.8%293.7%364.5%364.3%
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible:121.5%202.4%141.6%50.6%141.8%162.0%161.9%
Student-Teacher Ratio:17.20 18.09 17.65 18.30 18.48 17.20 18.00 

Test Performance




YearTestGradeMeasurementScoreSchool DistrictState Average
MCAS
2003English Language Arts7th Grade% proficient77.4%76.1%66%
2004English Language Arts7th Grade% proficient82%81%68%
2005English Language Arts7th Grade% proficient79%78%66%
2006English Language Arts7th Grade% proficient82%81%65%
2007English Language Arts7th Grade% proficient85%83%69%
2008English Language Arts7th Grade% proficient82%82%69%
2009English Language Arts7th Grade% proficient83%83%70%
2010English Language Arts7th Grade% proficient85%84%72%
2011English Language Arts7th Grade% proficient90%88%73%
2012English Language Arts7th Grade% proficient86%84%71%
2013English Language Arts7th Grade% proficient87%85%71%
2006Mathematics7th Grade% proficient61%59%40%
2007Mathematics7th Grade% proficient72%69%46%
2008Mathematics7th Grade% proficient63%62%47%
2009Mathematics7th Grade% proficient58%58%49%
2010Mathematics7th Grade% proficient64%63%53%
2011Mathematics7th Grade% proficient68%67%51%
2012Mathematics7th Grade% proficient65%63%51%
2013Mathematics7th Grade% proficient69%69%52%
2006English Language Arts8th Grade% proficient86%83%74%
2007English Language Arts8th Grade% proficient84%84%75%
2008English Language Arts8th Grade% proficient84%83%75%
2009English Language Arts8th Grade% proficient85%83%78%
2010English Language Arts8th Grade% proficient88%87%78%
2011English Language Arts8th Grade% proficient89%88%79%
2012English Language Arts8th Grade% proficient93%92%81%
2013English Language Arts8th Grade% proficient90%89%78%
2003Mathematics8th Grade% proficient55.1%54.6%37%
2004Mathematics8th Grade% proficient48%47%39%
2005Mathematics8th Grade% proficient49%47%39%
2006Mathematics8th Grade% proficient50%49%40%
2007Mathematics8th Grade% proficient55%54%45%
2008Mathematics8th Grade% proficient58%58%49%
2009Mathematics8th Grade% proficient54%53%48%
2010Mathematics8th Grade% proficient58%56%51%
2011Mathematics8th Grade% proficient53%52%52%
2012Mathematics8th Grade% proficient60%60%52%
2013Mathematics8th Grade% proficient57%56%54%
2003Science and Technology/Engineering8th Grade% proficient50.0%49.4%32%
2004Science and Technology/Engineering8th Grade% proficient37%37%33%
2005Science and Technology/Engineering8th Grade% proficient37%36%33%
2006Science and Technology/Engineering8th Grade% proficient47%45%32%
2007Science and Technology/Engineering8th Grade% proficient44%44%33%
2008Science and Technology/Engineering8th Grade% proficient51%50%39%
2009Science and Technology/Engineering8th Grade% proficient48%48%39%
2010Science and Technology/Engineering8th Grade% proficient55%54%40%
2011Science and Technology/Engineering8th Grade% proficient49%48%39%
2012Science and Technology/Engineering8th Grade% proficient56%54%43%
2013Science and Technology/Engineering8th Grade% proficient49%48%39%

Some data by SchoolDigger.com.


* King Philip Middle School was rated 4 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.


 
The USA.com website and domain are privately owned and are not operated by or affiliated with any government or municipal authority.
© 2018 World Media Group, LLC.