Garfield High School
435 North Firestone Blvd Akron OH, 44301, Summit County Phone: 330-773-6831 Ranking: (706 out of 821, bottom 14%)* Type: Regular High School Status: Currently Operational Grade: Grade 9 to Grade 12 School District: Akron City School District Title I Eligible School: Yes School-Wide Title I: NA Magnet: NA Charter: NA Shared-Time School: NA |
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | 46 | 55 | 60 | 74 | 81 | 83 | 85 | |||||||
Total Students: | 727 | 817 | 930 | 1,015 | 1,079 | 1,236 | 1,291 | |||||||
Grade 9: | 201 | 27.6% | 264 | 32.3% | 319 | 34.3% | 331 | 32.6% | 356 | 33.0% | 416 | 33.7% | 420 | 32.5% |
Grade 10: | 205 | 28.2% | 195 | 23.9% | 206 | 22.2% | 232 | 22.9% | 252 | 23.4% | 294 | 23.8% | 321 | 24.9% |
Grade 11: | 167 | 23.0% | 188 | 23.0% | 210 | 22.6% | 239 | 23.5% | 250 | 23.2% | 289 | 23.4% | 300 | 23.2% |
Grade 12: | 154 | 21.2% | 170 | 20.8% | 195 | 21.0% | 213 | 21.0% | 221 | 20.5% | 237 | 19.2% | 250 | 19.4% |
Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 357 | 49.1% | 400 | 49.0% | 459 | 49.4% | 490 | 48.3% | 507 | 47.0% | 581 | 47.0% | 631 | 48.9% |
Female: | 370 | 50.9% | 417 | 51.0% | 471 | 50.6% | 525 | 51.7% | 515 | 47.7% | 616 | 49.8% | 634 | 49.1% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 2 | 0.3% | 5 | 0.6% | 3 | 0.3% | 2 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% |
Asian: | 33 | 4.5% | 32 | 3.9% | 34 | 3.7% | 32 | 3.2% | 38 | 3.5% | 47 | 3.8% | 56 | 4.3% |
Hispanic: | 20 | 2.8% | 23 | 2.8% | 17 | 1.8% | 25 | 2.5% | 23 | 2.1% | 28 | 2.3% | 21 | 1.6% |
Black: | 452 | 62.2% | 510 | 62.4% | 584 | 62.8% | 639 | 63.0% | 654 | 60.6% | 755 | 61.1% | 772 | 59.8% |
White: | 182 | 25.0% | 197 | 24.1% | 238 | 25.6% | 276 | 27.2% | 314 | 29.1% | 375 | 30.3% | 420 | 32.5% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 38 | 5.2% | 50 | 6.1% | 54 | 5.8% | 41 | 4.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 724 | 99.6% | NA | NA | 755 | 81.2% | 769 | 75.8% | 774 | 71.7% | 823 | 66.6% | NA | NA |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA | 73 | 7.8% | 75 | 7.4% | 90 | 8.3% | 118 | 9.5% | NA | NA |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 15.80 | 14.85 | 15.50 | 13.77 | 13.29 | 14.90 | 15.20 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
OGT | ||||||
2004 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 61.6% | 54.6% | 84.5% |
2005 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 73.1% | 72.9% | 81.6% |
2006 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 77.5% | 75.2% | 82.7% |
2007 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 66.1% | 70.4% | 81% |
2008 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 68.4% | 69.8% | 79% |
2009 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 72.8% | 71.6% | 81.4% |
2010 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 62.2% | 69.4% | 80.4% |
2011 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 64.9% | 70.7% | 82.6% |
2012 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 72.2% | 72.0% | 82.6% |
2013 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 75.4% | 71.9% | 83.3% |
2004 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 72% | 66.8% | 95.7% |
2005 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 90.2% | 87.8% | 92% |
2006 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 82.9% | 85.1% | 89.4% |
2007 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 79.6% | 80.7% | 86.7% |
2008 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 77.9% | 78% | 85.2% |
2009 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 74.3% | 75.2% | 84.5% |
2010 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 68% | 74.2% | 83% |
2011 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 63.7% | 77.9% | 87.2% |
2012 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 75.4% | 77.0% | 86% |
2013 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 82.0% | 79.9% | 87.6% |
2005 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 59.6% | 61.1% | 73% |
2006 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 56.6% | 60.6% | 73.1% |
2007 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 52.1% | 58.1% | 72.1% |
2008 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 55.3% | 58.9% | 72.8% |
2009 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 59.4% | 62.3% | 76% |
2010 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 52% | 58% | 73% |
2011 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 43.6% | 56.2% | 74.7% |
2012 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 55.7% | 61.6% | 81.6% |
2013 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 59.0% | 62.0% | 77.2% |
2005 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 68.2% | 68.1% | 79.3% |
2006 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 68.9% | 72.8% | 79.5% |
2007 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 63.2% | 65.3% | 76% |
2008 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 73.2% | 73.1% | 78.4% |
2009 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 73.4% | 72.4% | 81.6% |
2010 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 66.7% | 67.9% | 79.6% |
2011 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 55.2% | 65.5% | 80.1% |
2012 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 74.1% | 71.4% | 76.7% |
2013 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 73.1% | 69.3% | 81.1% |
2005 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 80.1% | 78.4% | 83.7% |
2006 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 86.1% | 83.9% | 88% |
2007 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 83.7% | 84.9% | 89.3% |
2008 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 73% | 78% | 85.2% |
2009 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 83.7% | 85% | 89.7% |
2010 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 70.2% | 77.4% | 84.1% |
2011 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 69.8% | 80.7% | 89.5% |
2012 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 73.3% | 80.7% | 87.1% |
2013 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 72.9% | 78.2% | 84.9% |
2007 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 84.1% | 85.6% | 88.8% |
2008 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 82.8% | 83.9% | 88.2% |
2009 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 82.3% | 83.2% | 88.5% |
2010 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 85.3% | 82.8% | 89.2% |
2011 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 78.7% | 82.8% | 89.1% |
2012 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 76.4% | 84.2% | 89.9% |
2013 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 80.9% | 82.4% | 88.9% |
2007 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 93.2% | 92.1% | 92.8% |
2008 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 89.2% | 90% | 91.9% |
2009 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 93% | 91% | 92.8% |
2010 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 90.1% | 87.2% | 91.6% |
2011 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 86% | 88.1% | 92.4% |
2012 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 79.4% | 87.0% | 92.6% |
2013 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 89.8% | 87.7% | 92.9% |
2007 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 73.1% | 76.9% | 83.6% |
2008 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 71.3% | 75.3% | 83.6% |
2009 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 73.1% | 75.9% | 84.2% |
2010 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 76.3% | 76.3% | 85.1% |
2011 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 71% | 72.8% | 84.2% |
2012 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 62.1% | 74.7% | 87.8% |
2013 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 73.2% | 74.0% | 85.1% |
2007 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 86.4% | 86.4% | 87.6% |
2008 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 82.8% | 83% | 86.5% |
2009 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 85.1% | 84.6% | 88.6% |
2010 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 82.8% | 81.7% | 88.7% |
2011 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 76.3% | 80.9% | 88% |
2012 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 71.3% | 79.2% | 85.6% |
2013 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 80.9% | 80.8% | 88.2% |
2007 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 95.1% | 93.3% | 93.4% |
2008 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 90.8% | 92.2% | 93% |
2009 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 88.5% | 91% | 93.2% |
2010 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 90.1% | 90% | 0% |
2011 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 86.5% | 88.6% | 93.4% |
2012 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 82.2% | 88.3% | 93% |
2013 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 88.5% | 88.2% | 92.1% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Garfield High School was rated 3.5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.