Napa Metro Area Historical House Occupancy Status Data
ACS 2010-2014 data
| | Napa Area | California | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 55,003, see rank, 100% | 13,781,929 | 132,741,033 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 49,631, 90.23%, see rank | 91.55% | 87.55% |
| Owner Occupied | 29,997, 54.54%, see rank | 50.13% | 56.34% |
| Renter Occupied | 19,634, 35.70%, see rank | 41.42% | 31.21% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 5,372, 9.77%, see rank | 8.45% | 12.45% |
| For Rent | 1,231, 2.24%, see rank | 2.00% | 2.34% |
| For Sale Only | 430, 0.78%, see rank | 0.83% | 1.20% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 357, 0.65%, see rank | 0.78% | 0.92% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 2,221, 4.04%, see rank | 2.61% | 3.97% |
| For Migrant Workers | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.02% | 0.03% |
| Other Vacant | 1,133, 2.06%, see rank | 2.21% | 4.00% |
US Census 2010 data
| | Napa Area | California | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 54,759, see rank, 100% | 13,680,081 | 131,704,730 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 48,876, 89.26%, see rank | 91.94% | 88.62% |
| Owner Occupied | 30,597, 55.88%, see rank | 51.43% | 57.69% |
| Renter Occupied | 18,279, 33.38%, see rank | 40.51% | 30.93% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 5,883, 10.74%, see rank | 8.06% | 11.38% |
| For Rent | 1,393, 2.54%, see rank | 2.74% | 3.14% |
| For Sale Only | 743, 1.36%, see rank | 1.13% | 1.44% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 271, 0.49%, see rank | 0.40% | 0.48% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 2,322, 4.24%, see rank | 2.21% | 3.53% |
| For Migrant Workers | 7, 0.01%, see rank | 0.02% | 0.02% |
| Other Vacant | 1,147, 2.09%, see rank | 1.56% | 2.77% |
ACS 2008-2012 data
| | Napa Area | California | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 54,639, see rank, 100% | 13,667,226 | 131,642,457 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 49,209, 90.06%, see rank | 91.21% | 87.53% |
| Owner Occupied | 30,455, 55.74%, see rank | 51.06% | 57.34% |
| Renter Occupied | 18,754, 34.32%, see rank | 40.15% | 30.19% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 5,430, 9.94%, see rank | 8.79% | 12.47% |
| For Rent | 1,127, 2.06%, see rank | 2.14% | 2.50% |
| For Sale Only | 898, 1.64%, see rank | 1.12% | 1.38% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 359, 0.66%, see rank | 0.80% | 0.91% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 2,480, 4.54%, see rank | 2.49% | 3.81% |
| For Migrant Workers | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.02% | 0.03% |
| Other Vacant | 566, 1.04%, see rank | 2.22% | 3.84% |
ACS 2006-2010 data
| | Napa Area | California | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 54,306, see rank, 100% | 13,552,624 | 130,038,080 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 49,179, 90.56%, see rank | 91.44% | 87.85% |
| Owner Occupied | 31,996, 58.92%, see rank | 52.48% | 58.51% |
| Renter Occupied | 17,183, 31.64%, see rank | 38.97% | 29.33% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 5,127, 9.44%, see rank | 8.56% | 12.15% |
| For Rent | 839, 1.54%, see rank | 2.09% | 2.53% |
| For Sale Only | 822, 1.51%, see rank | 1.20% | 1.45% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 430, 0.79%, see rank | 0.80% | 0.95% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 2,330, 4.29%, see rank | 2.34% | 3.60% |
| For Migrant Workers | 48, 0.09%, see rank | 0.02% | 0.03% |
| Other Vacant | 658, 1.21%, see rank | 2.11% | 3.59% |
ACS 2005-2009 data
| | Napa Area | California | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 53,041, see rank, 100% | 13,268,682 | 127,699,712 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 48,094, 90.67%, see rank | 91.85% | 88.18% |
| Owner Occupied | 31,794, 59.94%, see rank | 53.22% | 58.98% |
| Renter Occupied | 16,300, 30.73%, see rank | 38.63% | 29.20% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 4,947, 9.33%, see rank | 8.15% | 11.82% |
| For Rent | 855, 1.61%, see rank | 1.99% | 2.52% |
| For Sale Only | 913, 1.72%, see rank | 1.12% | 1.39% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 452, 0.85%, see rank | 0.81% | 0.99% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 2,154, 4.06%, see rank | 2.24% | 3.45% |
| For Migrant Workers | 42, 0.08%, see rank | 0.02% | 0.03% |
| Other Vacant | 531, 1.00%, see rank | 1.97% | 3.44% |
* ACS stands for U.S. Census American Community Survey. According to the U.S. Census, if the date is a range, you can interpret the data as an average of the period of time.
