Lake City Micro Area Historical House Occupancy Status Data
ACS 2010-2014 data
| | Lake City Area | Florida | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 28,460, see rank, 100% | 9,051,851 | 132,741,033 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 23,714, 83.32%, see rank | 79.74% | 87.55% |
| Owner Occupied | 16,985, 59.68%, see rank | 52.73% | 56.34% |
| Renter Occupied | 6,729, 23.64%, see rank | 27.01% | 31.21% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 4,746, 16.68%, see rank | 20.26% | 12.45% |
| For Rent | 648, 2.28%, see rank | 2.97% | 2.34% |
| For Sale Only | 555, 1.95%, see rank | 1.66% | 1.20% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 198, 0.70%, see rank | 1.21% | 0.92% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 838, 2.94%, see rank | 9.84% | 3.97% |
| For Migrant Workers | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.04% | 0.03% |
| Other Vacant | 2,507, 8.81%, see rank | 4.54% | 4.00% |
US Census 2010 data
| | Lake City Area | Florida | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 28,636, see rank, 100% | 8,989,580 | 131,704,730 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 24,941, 87.10%, see rank | 82.55% | 88.62% |
| Owner Occupied | 18,213, 63.60%, see rank | 55.61% | 57.69% |
| Renter Occupied | 6,728, 23.49%, see rank | 26.94% | 30.93% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 3,695, 12.90%, see rank | 17.45% | 11.38% |
| For Rent | 1,040, 3.63%, see rank | 4.13% | 3.14% |
| For Sale Only | 542, 1.89%, see rank | 2.21% | 1.44% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 162, 0.57%, see rank | 0.53% | 0.48% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 716, 2.50%, see rank | 7.31% | 3.53% |
| For Migrant Workers | 2, 0.01%, see rank | 0.02% | 0.02% |
| Other Vacant | 1,233, 4.31%, see rank | 3.26% | 2.77% |
ACS 2008-2012 data
| | Lake City Area | Florida | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 28,451, see rank, 100% | 8,983,414 | 131,642,457 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 23,789, 83.61%, see rank | 79.56% | 87.53% |
| Owner Occupied | 16,646, 58.51%, see rank | 54.16% | 57.34% |
| Renter Occupied | 7,143, 25.11%, see rank | 25.40% | 30.19% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 4,662, 16.39%, see rank | 20.44% | 12.47% |
| For Rent | 639, 2.25%, see rank | 3.35% | 2.50% |
| For Sale Only | 398, 1.40%, see rank | 2.07% | 1.38% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 197, 0.69%, see rank | 1.20% | 0.91% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 879, 3.09%, see rank | 9.43% | 3.81% |
| For Migrant Workers | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.06% | 0.03% |
| Other Vacant | 2,549, 8.96%, see rank | 4.35% | 3.84% |
ACS 2006-2010 data
| | Lake City Area | Florida | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 27,993, see rank, 100% | 8,863,057 | 130,038,080 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 24,177, 86.37%, see rank | 80.70% | 87.85% |
| Owner Occupied | 17,289, 61.76%, see rank | 56.26% | 58.51% |
| Renter Occupied | 6,888, 24.61%, see rank | 24.44% | 29.33% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 3,816, 13.63%, see rank | 19.30% | 12.15% |
| For Rent | 524, 1.87%, see rank | 3.22% | 2.53% |
| For Sale Only | 359, 1.28%, see rank | 2.38% | 1.45% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 226, 0.81%, see rank | 1.23% | 0.95% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 769, 2.75%, see rank | 8.71% | 3.60% |
| For Migrant Workers | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.06% | 0.03% |
| Other Vacant | 1,938, 6.92%, see rank | 3.69% | 3.59% |
ACS 2005-2009 data
| | Lake City Area | Florida | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 25,986, see rank, 100% | 8,641,264 | 127,699,712 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 22,396, 86.18%, see rank | 81.89% | 88.18% |
| Owner Occupied | 16,283, 62.66%, see rank | 57.09% | 58.98% |
| Renter Occupied | 6,113, 23.52%, see rank | 24.80% | 29.20% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 3,590, 13.82%, see rank | 18.11% | 11.82% |
| For Rent | 534, 2.05%, see rank | 3.01% | 2.52% |
| For Sale Only | 244, 0.94%, see rank | 2.17% | 1.39% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 286, 1.10%, see rank | 1.30% | 0.99% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 744, 2.86%, see rank | 8.28% | 3.45% |
| For Migrant Workers | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.07% | 0.03% |
| Other Vacant | 1,782, 6.86%, see rank | 3.28% | 3.44% |
* ACS stands for U.S. Census American Community Survey. According to the U.S. Census, if the date is a range, you can interpret the data as an average of the period of time.
