USA.com / Minnesota / Chisago County / Chisago City, MN / Population and Races / Historical Marital Status Data
Chisago City, MN Historical Marital Status Data
ACS 2010-2014 data
Total population: 4,951
| Chisago City, MN | % | Minnesota | U.S. | |
| 15 Years and Over Total | 3,993 | see rank | 4,319,213 | 252,974,135 |
| Males, 15 Years and Over | 2,192 | 100%, see rank | 2,130,079 | 123,281,364 |
| Never Married | 657 | 29.97%, see rank | 34.67% | 35.77% |
| Married | 1,087 | 49.59%, see rank | 54.24% | 52.04% |
| Widowed | 109 | 4.97%, see rank | 2.18% | 2.57% |
| Divorced | 339 | 15.47%, see rank | 8.91% | 9.62% |
| Females, 15 Years and Over | 1,801 | 100%, see rank | 2,189,134 | 129,692,771 |
| Never Married | 247 | 13.71%, see rank | 28.21% | 29.48% |
| Married | 1,065 | 59.13%, see rank | 52.78% | 49.19% |
| Widowed | 311 | 17.27%, see rank | 8.15% | 9.16% |
| Divorced | 178 | 9.88%, see rank | 10.86% | 12.16% |
ACS 2008-2012 data
Total population: 4,922
| Chisago City, MN | % | Minnesota | U.S. | |
| 15 Years and Over Total | 4,030 | see rank | 4,252,629 | 248,042,237 |
| Males, 15 Years and Over | 2,024 | 100%, see rank | 2,096,023 | 120,789,875 |
| Never Married | 574 | 28.36%, see rank | 34.18% | 35.08% |
| Married | 1,185 | 58.55%, see rank | 55.05% | 52.93% |
| Widowed | 80 | 3.95%, see rank | 2.11% | 2.53% |
| Divorced | 185 | 9.14%, see rank | 8.66% | 9.46% |
| Females, 15 Years and Over | 2,006 | 100%, see rank | 2,156,606 | 127,252,362 |
| Never Married | 312 | 15.55%, see rank | 27.80% | 28.74% |
| Married | 1,175 | 58.57%, see rank | 53.22% | 49.95% |
| Widowed | 355 | 17.70%, see rank | 8.34% | 9.34% |
| Divorced | 164 | 8.18%, see rank | 10.64% | 11.97% |
ACS 2006-2010 data
Total population: 4,881
| Chisago City, MN | % | Minnesota | U.S. | |
| 15 Years and Over Total | 3,981 | see rank | 4,185,517 | 243,073,468 |
| Males, 15 Years and Over | 1,954 | 100%, see rank | 2,061,784 | 118,264,295 |
| Never Married | 376 | 19.24%, see rank | 33.51% | 34.21% |
| Married | 1,286 | 65.81%, see rank | 55.95% | 54.02% |
| Widowed | 105 | 5.37%, see rank | 2.10% | 2.52% |
| Divorced | 187 | 9.57%, see rank | 8.43% | 9.25% |
| Females, 15 Years and Over | 2,027 | 100%, see rank | 2,123,733 | 124,809,173 |
| Never Married | 187 | 9.23%, see rank | 27.29% | 27.93% |
| Married | 1,295 | 63.89%, see rank | 53.84% | 50.85% |
| Widowed | 410 | 20.23%, see rank | 8.58% | 9.55% |
| Divorced | 135 | 6.66%, see rank | 10.29% | 11.66% |
ACS 2005-2009 data
Total population: 4,381
| Chisago City, MN | % | Minnesota | U.S. | |
| 15 Years and Over Total | 3,727 | see rank | 4,148,448 | 240,146,935 |
| Males, 15 Years and Over | 1,785 | 100%, see rank | 2,048,103 | 117,166,601 |
| Never Married | 402 | 22.52%, see rank | 33.45% | 34.13% |
| Married | 1,248 | 69.92%, see rank | 56.08% | 54.15% |
| Widowed | 28 | 1.57%, see rank | 2.09% | 2.53% |
| Divorced | 107 | 5.99%, see rank | 8.38% | 9.19% |
| Females, 15 Years and Over | 1,942 | 100%, see rank | 2,100,345 | 122,980,334 |
| Never Married | 196 | 10.09%, see rank | 27.32% | 27.67% |
| Married | 1,254 | 64.57%, see rank | 53.79% | 50.88% |
| Widowed | 349 | 17.97%, see rank | 8.73% | 9.85% |
| Divorced | 143 | 7.36%, see rank | 10.16% | 11.60% |
US Census 2000 data
Total population: 2,622
| Chisago City, MN | % | Minnesota | U.S. | |
| 15 Years and Over Total | 2,001 | see rank | 3,857,755 | 221,148,671 |
| Males, 15 Years and Over | 855 | 100%, see rank | 1,889,936 | 107,027,405 |
| Never Married | 228 | 26.67%, see rank | 31.32% | 30.26% |
| Married | 505 | 59.06%, see rank | 58.59% | 58.58% |
| Widowed | 51 | 5.96%, see rank | 2.12% | 2.52% |
| Divorced | 71 | 8.30%, see rank | 7.97% | 8.65% |
| Females, 15 Years and Over | 1,146 | 100%, see rank | 1,967,819 | 114,121,266 |
| Never Married | 255 | 22.25%, see rank | 24.98% | 24.13% |
| Married | 521 | 45.46%, see rank | 56.19% | 54.60% |
| Widowed | 264 | 23.04%, see rank | 9.38% | 10.49% |
| Divorced | 106 | 9.25%, see rank | 9.45% | 10.78% |
* ACS stands for U.S. Census American Community Survey. According to the U.S. Census, if the date is a range, you can interpret the data as an average of the period of time.