Cedar City Micro Area Historical House Occupancy Status Data
ACS 2010-2014 data
| | Cedar City Area | Utah | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 19,879, see rank, 100% | 999,734 | 132,741,033 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 15,135, 76.14%, see rank | 89.64% | 87.55% |
| Owner Occupied | 9,513, 47.85%, see rank | 62.48% | 56.34% |
| Renter Occupied | 5,622, 28.28%, see rank | 27.17% | 31.21% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 4,744, 23.86%, see rank | 10.36% | 12.45% |
| For Rent | 815, 4.10%, see rank | 1.67% | 2.34% |
| For Sale Only | 475, 2.39%, see rank | 1.12% | 1.20% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 116, 0.58%, see rank | 0.65% | 0.92% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 2,887, 14.52%, see rank | 4.93% | 3.97% |
| For Migrant Workers | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.04% | 0.03% |
| Other Vacant | 451, 2.27%, see rank | 1.95% | 4.00% |
US Census 2010 data
| | Cedar City Area | Utah | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 19,667, see rank, 100% | 979,709 | 131,704,730 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 15,022, 76.38%, see rank | 89.59% | 88.62% |
| Owner Occupied | 9,567, 48.64%, see rank | 63.09% | 57.69% |
| Renter Occupied | 5,455, 27.74%, see rank | 26.49% | 30.93% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 4,645, 23.62%, see rank | 10.41% | 11.38% |
| For Rent | 772, 3.93%, see rank | 2.06% | 3.14% |
| For Sale Only | 411, 2.09%, see rank | 1.49% | 1.44% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 104, 0.53%, see rank | 0.43% | 0.48% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 2,620, 13.32%, see rank | 4.90% | 3.53% |
| For Migrant Workers | 8, 0.04%, see rank | 0.02% | 0.02% |
| Other Vacant | 730, 3.71%, see rank | 1.51% | 2.77% |
ACS 2008-2012 data
| | Cedar City Area | Utah | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 19,595, see rank, 100% | 979,848 | 131,642,457 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 15,497, 79.09%, see rank | 89.90% | 87.53% |
| Owner Occupied | 9,692, 49.46%, see rank | 63.32% | 57.34% |
| Renter Occupied | 5,805, 29.62%, see rank | 26.58% | 30.19% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 4,098, 20.91%, see rank | 10.10% | 12.47% |
| For Rent | 886, 4.52%, see rank | 1.64% | 2.50% |
| For Sale Only | 347, 1.77%, see rank | 1.25% | 1.38% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 103, 0.53%, see rank | 0.72% | 0.91% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 2,394, 12.22%, see rank | 4.67% | 3.81% |
| For Migrant Workers | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.03% | 0.03% |
| Other Vacant | 368, 1.88%, see rank | 1.79% | 3.84% |
ACS 2006-2010 data
| | Cedar City Area | Utah | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 18,845, see rank, 100% | 952,370 | 130,038,080 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 15,155, 80.42%, see rank | 90.21% | 87.85% |
| Owner Occupied | 9,581, 50.84%, see rank | 64.21% | 58.51% |
| Renter Occupied | 5,574, 29.58%, see rank | 26.00% | 29.33% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 3,690, 19.58%, see rank | 9.79% | 12.15% |
| For Rent | 537, 2.85%, see rank | 1.65% | 2.53% |
| For Sale Only | 218, 1.16%, see rank | 1.19% | 1.45% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 88, 0.47%, see rank | 0.80% | 0.95% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 2,250, 11.94%, see rank | 4.35% | 3.60% |
| For Migrant Workers | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.02% | 0.03% |
| Other Vacant | 597, 3.17%, see rank | 1.78% | 3.59% |
ACS 2005-2009 data
| | Cedar City Area | Utah | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 17,758, see rank, 100% | 919,334 | 127,699,712 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 14,304, 80.55%, see rank | 90.45% | 88.18% |
| Owner Occupied | 8,939, 50.34%, see rank | 65.17% | 58.98% |
| Renter Occupied | 5,365, 30.21%, see rank | 25.28% | 29.20% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 3,454, 19.45%, see rank | 9.55% | 11.82% |
| For Rent | 404, 2.28%, see rank | 1.67% | 2.52% |
| For Sale Only | 194, 1.09%, see rank | 1.08% | 1.39% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 113, 0.64%, see rank | 0.83% | 0.99% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 2,161, 12.17%, see rank | 4.10% | 3.45% |
| For Migrant Workers | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.01% | 0.03% |
| Other Vacant | 582, 3.28%, see rank | 1.85% | 3.44% |
* ACS stands for U.S. Census American Community Survey. According to the U.S. Census, if the date is a range, you can interpret the data as an average of the period of time.
