Boise City, Nampa Metro Area Historical House Occupancy Status Data
ACS 2010-2014 data
| Boise City, Nampa Area | Idaho | U.S. |
Total Housing Units | 250,085, see rank, 100% | 675,421 | 132,741,033 |
Occupied Housing Units | 232,248, 92.87%, see rank | 86.65% | 87.55% |
Owner Occupied | 158,062, 63.20%, see rank | 59.96% | 56.34% |
Renter Occupied | 74,186, 29.66%, see rank | 26.69% | 31.21% |
Vacant Housing Units | 17,837, 7.13%, see rank | 13.35% | 12.45% |
For Rent | 3,370, 1.35%, see rank | 1.70% | 2.34% |
For Sale Only | 3,668, 1.47%, see rank | 1.36% | 1.20% |
Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 2,791, 1.12%, see rank | 0.97% | 0.92% |
For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 4,048, 1.62%, see rank | 6.67% | 3.97% |
For Migrant Workers | 41, 0.02%, see rank | 0.10% | 0.03% |
Other Vacant | 3,919, 1.57%, see rank | 2.54% | 4.00% |
US Census 2010 data
| Boise City, Nampa Area | Idaho | U.S. |
Total Housing Units | 246,052, see rank, 100% | 667,796 | 131,704,730 |
Occupied Housing Units | 225,594, 91.69%, see rank | 86.76% | 88.62% |
Owner Occupied | 156,740, 63.70%, see rank | 60.63% | 57.69% |
Renter Occupied | 68,854, 27.98%, see rank | 26.13% | 30.93% |
Vacant Housing Units | 20,458, 8.31%, see rank | 13.24% | 11.38% |
For Rent | 6,176, 2.51%, see rank | 2.45% | 3.14% |
For Sale Only | 5,508, 2.24%, see rank | 1.92% | 1.44% |
Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 1,174, 0.48%, see rank | 0.48% | 0.48% |
For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 3,611, 1.47%, see rank | 6.24% | 3.53% |
For Migrant Workers | 50, 0.02%, see rank | 0.09% | 0.02% |
Other Vacant | 3,939, 1.60%, see rank | 2.06% | 2.77% |
ACS 2008-2012 data
| Boise City, Nampa Area | Idaho | U.S. |
Total Housing Units | 245,982, see rank, 100% | 666,718 | 131,642,457 |
Occupied Housing Units | 226,211, 91.96%, see rank | 86.64% | 87.53% |
Owner Occupied | 156,203, 63.50%, see rank | 60.72% | 57.34% |
Renter Occupied | 70,008, 28.46%, see rank | 25.92% | 30.19% |
Vacant Housing Units | 19,771, 8.04%, see rank | 13.36% | 12.47% |
For Rent | 4,723, 1.92%, see rank | 2.00% | 2.50% |
For Sale Only | 4,666, 1.90%, see rank | 1.57% | 1.38% |
Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 1,989, 0.81%, see rank | 0.81% | 0.91% |
For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 3,957, 1.61%, see rank | 6.26% | 3.81% |
For Migrant Workers | 77, 0.03%, see rank | 0.11% | 0.03% |
Other Vacant | 4,359, 1.77%, see rank | 2.61% | 3.84% |
ACS 2006-2010 data
| Boise City, Nampa Area | Idaho | U.S. |
Total Housing Units | 240,349, see rank, 100% | 652,323 | 130,038,080 |
Occupied Housing Units | 221,144, 92.01%, see rank | 87.42% | 87.85% |
Owner Occupied | 155,887, 64.86%, see rank | 62.06% | 58.51% |
Renter Occupied | 65,257, 27.15%, see rank | 25.36% | 29.33% |
Vacant Housing Units | 19,205, 7.99%, see rank | 12.58% | 12.15% |
For Rent | 5,176, 2.15%, see rank | 1.94% | 2.53% |
For Sale Only | 4,772, 1.99%, see rank | 1.63% | 1.45% |
Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 1,768, 0.74%, see rank | 0.85% | 0.95% |
For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 3,660, 1.52%, see rank | 5.60% | 3.60% |
For Migrant Workers | 133, 0.06%, see rank | 0.17% | 0.03% |
Other Vacant | 3,696, 1.54%, see rank | 2.39% | 3.59% |
ACS 2005-2009 data
| Boise City, Nampa Area | Idaho | U.S. |
Total Housing Units | 233,140, see rank, 100% | 626,901 | 127,699,712 |
Occupied Housing Units | 215,344, 92.37%, see rank | 88.17% | 88.18% |
Owner Occupied | 153,026, 65.64%, see rank | 62.82% | 58.98% |
Renter Occupied | 62,318, 26.73%, see rank | 25.35% | 29.20% |
Vacant Housing Units | 17,796, 7.63%, see rank | 11.83% | 11.82% |
For Rent | 4,692, 2.01%, see rank | 1.77% | 2.52% |
For Sale Only | 3,633, 1.56%, see rank | 1.42% | 1.39% |
Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 1,821, 0.78%, see rank | 0.86% | 0.99% |
For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 3,457, 1.48%, see rank | 5.27% | 3.45% |
For Migrant Workers | 178, 0.08%, see rank | 0.18% | 0.03% |
Other Vacant | 4,015, 1.72%, see rank | 2.34% | 3.44% |
* ACS stands for U.S. Census American Community Survey. According to the U.S. Census, if the date is a range, you can interpret the data as an average of the period of time.